|
Department of Psychological Sciences 703 Third Street West Lafayette, IN 47907-2081 |
|
Research interests include (1) interpersonal relations, including couple decision-making,
the cognitive representation of relationships, bias processes in relationship
maintenance, and social network interactions and influence; and (2)
social psychological dimensions of health behavior, including the attitudes,
attributions, and biases of individuals and couples concerning reproductive
health.
|
Recent Publications
|
Agnew, C.
R., Hoffman, A. M., Lehmiller, J. J., & Duncan, N. T. (in press). From
the interpersonal to the international: Understanding commitment to the
“War on Terror”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Lehmiller, J. J., & Agnew, C. R. (in press). Perceived marginalization and the prediction of romantic relationship stability. Journal of Marriage and Family. Agnew, C. R., Arriaga, X. B., & Wilson, J. E. (in press). Committed to what? Using the Bases of Relational Commitment Model to understand continuity and changes in social relationships. To appear in J. P. Forgas & J. Fitness (Eds.), Social relationships: Cognitive, affective and motivational processes. New York: Psychology Press. Lehmiller, J. J., & Agnew, C. R. (2006). Marginalized relationships: The impact of social disapproval on romantic relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 40-51.Arriaga, X. B., Reed, J., Goodfriend, W., & Agnew, C. R. (2006). Relationship perceptions and persistence: Do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1045-1065. Agnew, C. R., & Etcheverry, P. E. (2006). Cognitive interdependence: Considering self-in-relationship. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 274-293). New York: Guilford. Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., Le, B., & Goodfriend, W. (2004). Thinking close: Measuring relational closeness as perceived self-other inclusion. In D. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), The handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 103-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Etcheverry, P. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2004). Subjective norms and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Personal Relationships, 11, 409-428. Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57. Loving, T. J., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Socially desirable responding in close relationships: A dual-component approach and measure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,18,551-574. Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., & Drigotas, S. M. (2001). Substituting the forest for the trees: Social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1042-1057.Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1190-1203. Rusbult, C. E., Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Interdependence in close relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology, vol.2: Interpersonal processes (pp. 359-387). Oxford: Blackwell. Agnew, C. R. (1999). Power over interdependent behavior within the dyad: Who decides what a couple does? In L. J. Severy & W. B. Miller (Eds.), Advances in Population: Psychosocial Perspectives, Volume 3 (pp. 163-188). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939-954. |